UCD Surf

Find what matters in the design archive

UCD Coach

Practice brief · UCD methods

Heuristic evaluation still earns its place in 2026 toolkits

Published 1 September 2026 · Source dated 20 November 2025

Used for: Alpha assumption; Stakeholder brief; Portfolio proof; Tool experiment; Method refresh. Practice brief for the gate you are in — not an industry digest dump.

Hype check: Established. Treated as established practice. Source dated 20 November 2025.

Saves the claim and source date (20 November 2025) on this device. No account.

NN/g's ongoing guidance keeps reinforcing that classic usability methods — heuristic review, task analysis — remain the fastest way to catch obvious problems before you ever recruit a user.

With so much noise about AI-generated UI and new research tools, it's easy to assume the fundamentals have moved on. NN/g's continued output says otherwise: structured heuristic evaluation is still one of the cheapest, fastest ways to catch usability issues, and it's a method interviewers expect junior designers to actually be able to run, not just name. It's established for a reason — decades of use, low cost, works on a napkin sketch or a live product. Not flashy, but it's the kind of skill that makes your critique feedback sound credible rather than vibes-based.

Coach

Run a 10-minute heuristic pass on one screen in your portfolio project and write down three specific issues you'd fix.

Source: nngroup.com ·

Pair with UCD Coach

Coach is the forward habit — today's five, every morning. Surf is the rearward workbench on the same briefing corpus. Today's five is not restaged here.

Open today's five on UCD Coach

Daily email stays on Coach. Surf has no subscribe form.

More practice briefs on the same topic — not today's five from UCD Coach.